Luke Arno wrote:
On 10/27/05, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm stating a fact that is neither for or against any particular
format. It has not yet been fully demonstrated that XHTML is a good
solution. Likewise, it has not yet been fully demonstrated that XHTML
is not a good solution.
And how is that hand-waving useful to anyone?
I was simply answering your question. I believe I quite clearly
indicated that I was not debating the pros and cons of anything.
Debate the point or don't. If you are not sure pick a side
and say "I'm just playing devils advocate".
You are trying to raise concerns and when you are asked
to be specific you say "Oh, I am not for it or against it."
No, when you ask me if I'm arguing in favor of a specific format, I say
that I am not. You're very eager to get to me to come to a conclusion
one way or the other on the format and are assuming that since I haven't
yet seen the wisdom of your approach, I'm obviously against it and
should have a ready list of complaints you can debate. That's simply
not the way it works.
- James
