I have no strong preference either way. SHOULD would likely be enough to express the intent while still giving folks the freedom to do other things.
Tim Bray wrote: > > On May 3, 2006, at 3:55 PM, Thomas Broyer wrote: > >> I also still don't understand why the response body, if provided, >> "must" be an Atom Entry Document: > > Bah, we discussed this a *lot* and I thought it was pretty clear the WG > had consensus for an Atom entry or nothing. -Tim > >
