Bill de hÓra wrote: >[snip] > That would be bug compatibility then. Expect an ed.note in 09 unless > this is resolved. >
How about a Pace instead? That would be far more productive than an ed note. - James
Bill de hÓra wrote: >[snip] > That would be bug compatibility then. Expect an ed.note in 09 unless > this is resolved. >
How about a Pace instead? That would be far more productive than an ed note. - James