-1 (as of 7th May 2006)
It doesn't address population of compulsory entry feeds *, notably
author, id. Why is only title supported - bug compatibility with 08? The
workaround for summary/content is noted (though I somehow doubt that's
what the syntax wg had in mind)
It doesn't rationalize rel="edit-resource". And it needs to; editing
non-header metadata about a resource v editing the resource is a first
class webarch headache. How many resources are in play with a media entry?
I have a niggling worry that this header based stuff can't be supported
via regular HTML forms, and thus the protocol doesn't provide a natural
upgrade/adoption path without doing an end run around browsers (maybe
javascript write out headers?). Excluding most deployed HTTP clients
should be a conscious thing.
cheers
Bill
* Comment from James Tauber on something I wrote elsewhere about this:
"This magic is currently required in -08, with or without
PaceMediaEntries3."
No matter, I'll being taking this pace series on its merits. If it gets
rejected, we can talk about bugs in 08.
