Skip to site navigation (Press enter)
Re: Observations on the "error" discussion
Lucas Gonze
Fri, 05 Nov 2004 17:35:06 -0800
Speaking as a publisher who cares a lot about valid output, I'd much prefer an error checking service that gave me reports via a feed. Accepting reports from user software is likely to create a mess and eat up resources.
- Lucas
Previous message
View by thread
View by date
Next message
Re: Observations on the "error" discussi...
Paul Hoffman / IMC
Re: Observations on the "error" disc...
Roy T. Fielding
Re: Observations on the "error" ...
Danny Ayers
Re: Observations on the "error&qu...
Roy T. Fielding
Re: Observations on the "err...
Danny Ayers
Re: Observations on the "...
Sam Ruby
Re: Observations on the "error" ...
Mark Baker
Re: Observations on the "error&qu...
Robert Sayre
Re: Observations on the "error" ...
Tim Bray
Re: Observations on the "error&qu...
Roy T. Fielding
Re: Observations on the "err...
Lucas Gonze
Re: Observations on the "error" discussi...
Asbj�rn Ulsberg
Re: Observations on the "error" discussion
Martin Duerst
Re: Observations on the "error" discussi...
Paul Hoffman / IMC
Re: Observations on the "error" disc...
Asbj�rn Ulsberg
Re: Observations on the "error" ...
Julian Reschke
Re: Observations on the "error&qu...
Danny Ayers
Re: Observations on the "err...
Julian Reschke
Re: Observations on the "error&qu...
Asbj�rn Ulsberg
Re: Observations on the "error" discussion
Danny Ayers
Reply via email to
Search the site
The Mail Archive home
atom-syntax - all messages
atom-syntax - about the list
Expand
Previous message
Next message