On Nov 8, 2004, at 6:11 PM, Dare Obasanjo wrote:
...I don't. Two minor features is not cause enough for doubling the amount of widely used XML syndication formats on the Web
As redundant as the Atom syndication format is, I think there is some value in the Atom API
Dare, you may regard this effort as redundant, but I see it as my role to help ensure that this WG ships something that is acceptably feature-ful in an acceptable time-frame. Obviously there are trade-offs. You are explicitly saying that you don't think the Atom format is ready. Please outline for us which set of features you would consider it necessary that Atom have to be worth doing. Are they represented by existing Paces? If not, do you plan to create some covering the missing pieces? -Tim
