Paul Hoffman wrote:
Dan's fast.
I realize that there is no requirement to be consistent, but why the
difference:
http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom => http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4287
http://www.w3.org/2007/app => http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5023.txt
Given that the tools.ietf.org/html version contains a prominent link to
the .txt version, I'd suggest it be used in both places.
- Sam Ruby
Subject: Re: Atom namespace documents
From: Dan Connolly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Asbjørn Ulsberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Paul Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tim Bray
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Philippe Le Hegaret <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 21:26:37 -0500
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.0
On Sat, 2007-10-13 at 03:11 +0200, Asbjørn Ulsberg wrote:
Hi, Dan. I've taken the liberty to do some adjustments to the Atom
Syndication Format and Atom Publishing Protocol namespace documents
so they are more in line with other namespace documents published on
W3C, like e.g. <http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/>.
I've added the "Namespaces in XML" reference, referenced the same
stylesheet as the XHTML namespace document references, adjusted the
IETF logo to fit better with the W3C logo, adjusted the title of the
documents to be more coherent and added header elements to both
documents to match the XHTML namespace document and updated the
AtomPub namespace document to reflect that it is a proposed standard
(RFC-5023).
I hope you think these changes are okay and would publish these
documents along with the attached IETF logo on the W3C website
whenever you feel like it.
Thanks; I published your revisions:
http://www.w3.org/2007/app
$Revision: 1.3 $ of $Date: 2007/10/13 02:23:21 $
http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom
$Revision: 1.10 $ of $Date: 2007/10/13 02:19:32 $
I made just one change, to tidy the documents so that I could
see the diffs more clearly.
--
Asbjørn Ulsberg -=|=- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
«He's a loathsome offensive brute, yet I can't look away»
--
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
