Tim Bray wrote:
On Oct 14, 2007, at 5:18 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
Sam Ruby wrote:
I realize that there is no requirement to be consistent, but why the
difference:
http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom => http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4287
http://www.w3.org/2007/app => http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5023.txt
Given that the tools.ietf.org/html version contains a prominent link
to the .txt version, I'd suggest it be used in both places.
- Sam Ruby
Speaking of which, I have XML and "true" HTML (*) versions available
at <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/#rfc5023>.
What's the upstream XML source for that? Did you get the RFC editor
corrections in? -Tim
http://intertwingly.net/stories/2007/10/14/rfc5023.diff
Mostly page length and width differences.
this/This; Email/EMail
The greenbytes version also has a Copyright notice and an
Acknowledgement that the IETF version does not.
- Sam Ruby
