Julian Reschke wrote:
Sam Ruby wrote:
http://intertwingly.net/stories/2007/10/14/rfc5023.diff
Mostly page length and width differences.
this/This; Email/EMail
The greenbytes version also has a Copyright notice and an
Acknowledgement that the IETF version does not.
Well, it's not the "greenbytes" version, but the thing you are producing
from XML using xml2rfc. Right now, xml2rfc can't *exactly* produce what
the RFC Editor publishes -- I agree that this isn't satisfying; it would
be really great if the RFC Editor once and for all could tell the
xml2rfc maintainers what *exactly* it should produce.
Perhaps this will be clearer then.
Example of a non-page dimension differences between the .txt version
posted on the greenbytes site and the .txt version posted on the ietf site:
-Copyright Notice
-
- Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2007).
-
-Status of this Memo
+Status of This Memo
- Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+ EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+ EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Acknowledgment
- Funding for the RFC Editor function is provided by the IETF
- Administrative Support Activity (IASA).
I don't know the root cause of these differences, nor do I know whether
or not they indicate that there might be other, more substantive,
differences that I missed.
- Sam Ruby
