Sam Ruby wrote:
I realize that there is no requirement to be consistent, but why the
difference:
http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom => http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4287
http://www.w3.org/2007/app => http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5023.txt
Given that the tools.ietf.org/html version contains a prominent link to
the .txt version, I'd suggest it be used in both places.
- Sam Ruby
Speaking of which, I have XML and "true" HTML (*) versions available at
<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/#rfc5023>.
Best regards, Julian
(*) As in: not the result of post-processing the TXT version.
