Mark Nottingham wrote: > FWIW, I think a small individual submission on the standards > track would be the way to go here, defining a single new > feed-level element (preferably in the Atom namespace; I hope > we left ourselves enough wiggle room to do that!).
+1 on stuffing it in the Atom namespace or some other namespace that is commonly being used for stuff; The current way of having a new namespace for feature is getting increasingly awkward; we have documents where the namespace declarations outweigh the rest of the metadata. - Brian
