Which brings us back to one of my original points: it would make the most sense to have a single solution that works well across as many use cases as possible. Representing tombstones using x:deleted does that. Representing tombstones using atom:entry does not.
- James Joe Gregorio wrote: > [snip] > Those are arguments that actually make sense. I was thinking of > tombstones solely in the case of AtomPub collections, but in the > case of syndication the > > <x:deleted> > <id>tag:example.org,2007:/the/only/useful/thing/here</id> > </x:deleted> > > markup seems like a better fit. > > -joe >
