Le 27 janv. 2008 à 08:13, Sylvain Hellegouarch a écrit :
However if we decide to extend the atom vocabulary like Yahoo did
with Media-RSS, we ought to actually discuss first with the main
players in the field today (Apple, Microsoft, Xiph, EXIF, etc.) in
order to define the minimal relevant set of metadata for common
media formats.
Just for information, there has been work done also by a [W3C
incubator][1] group on [Multimedia Vocabularies][2]. It gives an
overview of the existing formats and their associated metadata. It's
quite cool.
# 1. Introduction
* 1.1 Declaration of Namespaces
* 1.2 Related Pages
# 2. Types of Multimedia Metadata
# 3. Existing Multimedia Metadata Formats
* 3.1 Multimedia Metadata Formats For Describing Still Images
* 3.2 Multimedia Metadata Formats For Describing Audio Content
* 3.3 Multimedia Metadata Formats For Describing Audio-Visual
Content
* 3.4 Multimedia Metadata Formats For Describing Multimedia
Presentations
* 3.5 Multimedia Metadata Formats For Describing Specific Domains
Or Workflows
* 3.6 Other Multimedia Metadata Related Formats
[1]: http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/
[2]: http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/mmsem/XGR-vocabularies/
--
Karl Dubost - W3C
http://www.w3.org/QA/
Be Strict To Be Cool
