Henry Story wrote:
Yes, very good point. I have created a new Page called AtomRDF [3], whose aim
is to track what would be needed for an Atom document to be an RDF document.
I have a number of problems with the AtomRDF document as it stands now.
For starters, the current atom:generator element has optional "uri" and "version" elements, not "atom:uri" and "atom:version" elements. Unfortunately, these are quite different.
More siginificantly, the document does not address the largest issue, which is content.
I do believe that it would be possible, and perhaps quite useful, to define an XSLT tranform from Atom/XML to RDF/XML.
- Sam Ruby
