Danny Ayers wrote:
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 14:38:17 -0500, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I do believe that it would be possible, and perhaps quite useful, to define an XSLT tranform from Atom/XML to RDF/XML.
Yep. Has anyone got one more recent than 0.3?
I'm waiting for the format to stabilize for publishing any mappings; my guess is that there are some Atom data structures that could see a lot of churn (links, dates, recursion) unless the consensus becomes 'enough already'.
Incidently the name AtomIsRDF isn't as problematic as the latent assumption - that Atom is some of kind of degenerate or special case of RDF. My opinion is that's a losing strategy if the goal is wider adoption of RDF.
cheers Bill
