Henri Sivonen wrote:
How's that relevant wrt. type='XHTML'? If you doubt the robustness of concatenation with XHTML, why wouldn't you keep using "entity-encoded HTML"?
Anne Van Kesteren wrote:
And, now I look at it, Robert is using HTML (the text/html MIME type implies that) so I do not see the problem.
Anne, Henri: thank you for missing the point.
Martin Duerst wrote:
>However, this is not going to reflect what's in MySQL.
Does it need to? Could anybody except for you check? Should anybody (including you) care? Is it part of conformance?
Yes. No. Yes. Yes.
Robert Sayre
