On 2 Apr 2005, at 14:16, Eric Scheid wrote:
On 2/4/05 8:15 PM, "Henry Story" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
no. <...omething.else.atom> is a resource, not a representation [1]. So what
you mean to say is that <...somethingelse.atom> is an alternate resource of
me.
Firstly, why is "<html>...</html> a representation, while "<entry> ...</entry>" not a representation?
I don't understand. Are you asking me? I am asserting that "<html>..</html>" and
<entry>...</entry> are both representations. I have put all representations in
rectangles in the attached diagram of my previous email, just to make this point.
Secondly ... "alternate resource" ... wha?
Argh. I was trying to show what was wrong with Thomas' argument. That is why that does not
make sense. If you read on you will see that I criticize his position for that reason.
A resource is an abstract thing, reified by representations, right?
Something along those lines yes.
Henry Story
