I am completely unclear why this discussion is going on. Is there a desire on the part of the W3C to take the Atom work into the W3C? If so, talking to the W3C/IETF liaison pair would be more appropriate than this mailing list. If not, then suggesting that our document should be more W3C-like seems fairly out-of-scope for an IETF WG.
Could you clarify? --Paul Hoffman, Director --Internet Mail Consortium
