On Aug 4, 2005, at 21:55, Joe Gregorio wrote:
"Some sections of this specification are illustrated with fragments of a non-normative RELAX NG Compact schema [RELAX-NG]. However, the text of this specification provides the definition of conformance. A complete schema appears in Appendix B." This is quoted directly from Section 1.3. This whitespace issue is a good illustration of why the schema isn't normative ;)
This thread makes me wonder if taking the schema seriously enough to actually encourage validation against the schema causes more harm than good. Perhaps I should remove the Atom schema from the presets of http://hsivonen.iki.fi/validator/ .
I would vote for leaving the text as is and having the validator give errors on whitespace.
ITYM, the Feed Validator and not a RELAX NG validator. -- Henri Sivonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
