On 8/16/05, Henry Story <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > An application that does not know your extension cannot know that the > text inside > your extension is to be interpreted as a relative uri. So what you > are saying is > that any application that wants to process atom with extension > elements has to keep > the full context of the document in which they found the extension > element,
No, Henry, that's not what I'm saying. I'm saying you do have to keep the Base URI of an atom:entry or atom:feed around, for a variety of reasons. The app should keep the extension text as it was entered. > I suggested writing the next tag like this: > > <link type="http://purl.org/syndication/history/1.0/next"; href="./ > archives/archive1.atom"> That's what I would do, too. Not my spec, though. Mainly so I could put a title in that said "Entries from August" or whatever. Robert Sayre
