On 12/12/06, James M Snell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
*If* the document proceeds to Proposed Standard, the new RFC would
update RFC4287 either by adding a new type param or by deprecating the
use of application/atom+xml for atom entry documents in favor of a new
media type. No other part of RFC4287 would be affected.
Ideally, I would much rather this be a WG draft. I pinged Tim about it
the other day and he suggested that I go ahead with a I-D for now and
that we can explore whether or not to move forward with it as a WG draft
later.
I'm uncomfortable with this.
If there's consensus to do something about identifying entry
documents, let's do that. If there isn't, let's not.
Mark.
