> > Bob Wyman wrote: >> There is, I think, a compromise position here which will avoid breaking >> those existing implementations which follow the existing RFC's. > > <co-chair-mode>In case you haven't noticed, the WG is hopelessly split > between the new-media-type option and the media-type-parameter option. > If a few people were to put up their hands and say "yeah what Bob said" > your co-chairs would probably do a hasty consensus grab.</co-chair-mode> >
Personally, I would say that if we find the proper way to notify implementors they can't dismiss the type parameter then I'll +1 that option over the new media type. However we know that implementations won't make the effort to take it into account then what's the point over the current status? - Sylvain
