Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > By the way, I didn't say that I go. If I find time to contribute > style support, I'd be very glad and I'll happily contribute that. > I'm just not going to work on the documentation, as long as it is > licensed under the current GFDL.
It is and never was my intent to trick people into participation in AUCTeX by representing the situation different than it was. If you feel that you have been treated unfairly, I would ask you to specify your contributions to the AUCTeX manual that you would rather not have contributed had you felt reason to expect that the manual could get relicensed under the GFDL. I would then see whether they can be replaced with reasonable effort. I actually think it is a good thing that we reached what I consider pretty much the final license state before I will start collecting copyright assignments from past contributors beyond the past maintainers. While it might make the collection harder in cases like yours or might necessitate rewriting some parts of AUCTeX, I hope it will not leave people with hard feelings because they feel duped by the process. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum _______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
