"Davide G. M. Salvetti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> DK> No part of AUCTeX will end up in Debian non-free without Davide
> DK> having to bend Debian rules even slightly.
Uh, this was probably not really phrased correctly. What I meant and
should have written:
No part of AUCTeX will end up in Debian non-free, and this without
Davide having to bend Debian rules even slightly.
I did not intend the meaning one could read into the original
sentence. Sorry if this came across differently.
> DK> This is a better situation than that of Emacs itself, and I am
> DK> grateful to be able to save users and developers the respective
> DK> hassles.
>
> I would like to make it clear that I do not see the need to fork
> anything, manual included. I'm happy with how AUCTeX is being
> developed and with how David is doing as the AUCTeX maintainer. I
> support AUCTeX being a GNU project. I shall not follow any fork:
> Debian will continue to include upstream AUCTeX, at least for what
> depends on me and with the current situation.
Thanks,
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
_______________________________________________
auctex-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
