P Floding Wrote: > > Unfortunately I have found quick A/B unsatisfactory for sound > evaluation for a number of reasons.
If the difference is _so_ subtle no one can tell the difference in an A/B test (and there's no reason for that test to be "quick"), why should we think it exists? Especially in this case, where there is a very strong reason to think there is no difference (the functioning of the squeezebox), as well as a very powerful explanation for why one was perceived by some (confirmation bias). > > In addition, "proof" that something is NOT audible cannot be > established. Only the opposite can possibly (but not necessarily) be > established. (This is a result of the laws of logic.) I don't follow. Neither can ever be proved, rather evidence can accumulate (and is starting to in this case). In fact, according to logic there is no (formal) difference between a statement and its converse. -- opaqueice ------------------------------------------------------------------------ opaqueice's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4234 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=22936 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
