PhilNYC Wrote: 
> Because the jitter performance of the Transporter's digital outs is
> measured to be much better than that of the SqueezeBox, and he's
> clearly looking for better performance.  Or even further, if the TacT
> has a word clock out, he'd get even better performance using the
> Transporter's word-clock input...

$2K is a lot of money to pay to get better jitter performance.
FYI- the TacT units don't have word clock out. 

BTW- what's the Transporter jitter performance verses the SB3?


-- 
mauidan
------------------------------------------------------------------------
mauidan's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1679
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=26332

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to