seanadams;131743 Wrote: > Exactly. But the onus is on YOU to do a reasonable experiment if you > think you can hear it. Do you really expect me to investigate every > idea like this that comes up? Come on.
OK, I can see how my earlier comment about "only bothering with the Transporter" can be read as demanding measurements. It wasn't a demand. I would never demand from anyone to back up with science any kind of preference they might have, and I certainly do not demand from hard working CEOs that they perform measurements they are not interested in. To me it is very simple: The system sounds better than it ever has, now when the analogue output has been muted. But I DO NOT claim that my experience is equivalent to scientific fact. It may well be placebo, and I intend to try to establish one way or the other when circumstances allow. P.S: Food for thought is why high-end equipment can sound better than mid level stuff, even though all measurable parameters on a cheap device may be well within "it can't possibly be heard" limits. Why is the Transporter audibly better than the SB3? (I assume it is.) -- P Floding ------------------------------------------------------------------------ P Floding's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2932 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=26436 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
