adamslim;156910 Wrote: > > I think that, since it's actually rather difficult to prove that > anything does not exist, it's generally better to give it the benefit > of the doubt until you've tried it yourself. I recognise the > inconsistency in that I apply this last statement to audio only! > Personally I do not understand the logic that argues "the benefit of the doubt". Shouldn't the proponent of a particular tweak have a moral (or even legal) obligation to provide credible evidence that their product does makes a diferrence, especially when they charge $1000 per foot? Why is the burden of prove on buying client ? Why does the skeptic has to prove that something does not exist, rather than believer prove that something does exist ?
Your analogy to religious way of thinking and audiophilia strikes me as very likely. Hence the lack of credibility. -- georgem George ------------------------------------------------------------------------ georgem's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7335 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29972 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
