P Floding;156978 Wrote: > Well, FYI, I'm a sceptic too. I just don't belive slagging people off > for not being scientifically trained will be any way forward > what-so-ever in educating anybody. Also, I don't think it is good > scientific practice to dismiss things per default just because it > "sounds fishy".
Who exactly did I slag off? As far as dismissing some of these things, if a manufacturer spouts pseudo-scientific crap at me about a product, the thing has no known technical or engineering basis behind it, and I haven't even been shown that it actually works at all (and a sighted test shows nothing, as we've all been over again and again), then I'm going to call "bullsh*t". Again, I'm not demanding that the thing be proven via measurements, or even at all, but if I'm to take it seriously, someone needs to have bothered to show that it really works in some vaguely rigorous manner. And the argument that X believed Y, which is analogous to your position (although not the same), and he was wrong in some respects, therefore you are wrong, as well, is not a good one, to get back to this subjectivist/objectivist thing. -- totoro squeezebox 3 -> mccormack dna .5 -> audio physic tempo 4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ totoro's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=5935 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29972 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
