totoro;156981 Wrote: > Who exactly did I slag off? > > As far as dismissing some of these things, if a manufacturer spouts > pseudo-scientific crap at me about a product, the thing has no known > technical or engineering basis behind it, and I haven't even been shown > that it actually works at all (and a sighted test shows nothing, as > we've all been over again and again), then I'm going to call > "bullsh*t". > > Again, I'm not demanding that the thing be proven via measurements, or > even at all, but if I'm to take it seriously, someone needs to have > bothered to show that it really works in some vaguely rigorous manner. > > > And the argument that X believed Y, which is analogous to your position > (although not the same), and he was wrong in some respects, therefore > you are wrong, as well, is not a good one, to get back to this > subjectivist/objectivist thing.
I haven't said anything about anyone in particular, as far as I'm aware. So there is no need to attribute anything of what I have said to anyone. As to the "X believed Y"-stuff I'm not sure what you are trying to say. All I'm saying is that history shows that those "objectivists" that claim to have definitive answers should show more humility -the same type of claims have been made before, and been proven wrong. -- P Floding ------------------------------------------------------------------------ P Floding's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2932 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29972 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
