Ron Olsen wrote: > P Floding;177693 Wrote: >> Oh, I didn't realize it is "causing a problem"! >> I simply am not interested in discussing ABX. I know about it. I know >> about the benefits with it, and I do it when I can and must. I really >> don't need any help remembering all this. Hence my "signature". > I really don't understand your opposition to ABX testing; some of the > most useful (and valid) audio results have been obtained by using this > methodology. > > For example, check out this codec comparision: > http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=36465 > > I trust the accuracy of these findings, but wouldn't if they were just > subjective opinions not arrived at in a blind fashion.
I think you're missing the point. PF is not opposed to ABX. He (and I, and others) just don't want to talk about it in every thread - it gets tedious. R. _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
