ezkcdude;180622 Wrote: > No, you're missing my point. Who should make the consensus? Scientists > or dabblers? What we are continually being told by climate change > skeptics, almost all of whom are outside the scientific community, is > that there is a robust debate going on. There isn't. One only need go > back to the 80's and follow what happened with AIDS. Sure, there was an > initial hysteria, and some bad science. But long after the disease of > AIDS had been figured out (i.e. symptoms, population, retrovirus), > there were "skeptics" who either a) thought AIDS was created by our > government, as a result of biological weapons reasearch or b) AIDS was > a punishment from God for "deviant" behaviors. I would suggest we are > in this phase with climate change. In 10 years this will look like a > silly debate. But back to audio...
I'm afraid your description of AIDS-silliness is not something I recognise at all from over here. Belief in authority is not my strong side. I prefer thinking for myself. I've seen too many "truths" turn out to be false. -- P Floding No, I didn't ABX it. And I won't even if you ask me. (Especially not if you ask me.) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ P Floding's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2932 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=32352 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
