gwnzen;233619 Wrote: > Thanks guys.. so how is the Transporter's(+inguz) performance compared > to sb3 with behringer deq2496 or TACT. would the inguz stand a chance, > my room will be treated, will it be just enough to use inguz?
Gee, there are a lot of implicit questions in there. 1) Transporter's Digital and analog outputs are superior to the SB3's, regardless of which room correction technique is used. 2) The performance of InguzDSP is dependent on the quality of the filters used. Creating a filter requires (a) software like Acourate, AudioLense, or Duff Room Correction (aka "DRC") (Google these terms), and (b) a quality measurement microphone and PC sound card. I use Acourate with a Behringer ECM8000 mic and EMU-0404 USB sound card and get a result from InguzDSP superior to my TacT 2.2X. (That is to say, the TacT is running in bypass mode, and all correction is done by InguzDSP using a correction filter generated by Acourate). Regards, Kim -- krochat ------ SB3 (+linear) -> Big Ben -> TacT RCS 2.2X -> 2xS2150 -> Vandersteen 3a Signature + TacT W210 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ krochat's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=6579 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=39124 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
