I did say my knowledge of clocking in audio signals was weak so thanks for the links. Sonet, more my thing although its an older technology but we still use it for some of our transport rings.
However, demonstrating 'how' an effect can be made still does not prove that the measurement of the normal effect is enough to produce an audible difference. However, since that statement can be used as a cop out for both sides of the story, I'll leave it at that in fairness to the original poster whom also has his own opinions as well. My view remains that if enough disruption is caused to create an audible difference than the technology is not working as intended and thus something needs to be investigated/repaired or replaced. (Yes I opened myself up with the word replaced but if your 'replacing', it doesn't really matter what you replace it with as long as it works to the required spec or better. Irregardless, we both agree that trying things out is the best way to decide for yourself if something sounds better. Proving it sounds better would require a double-blind listening test. Something most of us don't have the proper equipment to pull off. In the end, when you have money to spend, all that matters is that you are happy with the results. If you can provide respected (OK not the best term but you know what I mean) links of examples of double blind listening tests proving such equipment has produced audible improvements, then I would genuinely interested to read them. I say that not defensively, but inquisitively. I've posted my current opinion based on my personal experience but I like to keep an open mind. -- Murph ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Murph's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10553 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=39810 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
