DeVerm;353481 Wrote: > I find it very surprising that (I think) I am the only one researching > this further with google searches.
You're just the only one that ignores the other posters. opaqueice;352726 Wrote: > By the way, I had a look at the citations to that paper. There are a > total of 9 references in English which show up on google scholar, of > which some are loudspeaker manufacturer white-papers, one is a > description of the SACD standard, a few are by authors of the paper, > and only one is a scientific paper by other authors (but at one of the > same universities) - and it has nothing to do with HF sound audibility > (I think the reference is due to some of the EEG techniques used). > > This for a paper from 2000. > > Now this isn't my field, but a paper with only a few self-cites, > industry whitepapers, and a single more or less peripheral reference > from one's colleagues after 8 years is a failure. It usually means the > paper is believed to be wrong by everyone else in the field and hence is > ignored. > > Oh - and ISI turns up this one as well: > > "Signal to noise: calculating the high-resolution-audio reality-to-hype > ratio" which refers to it as well. > > > > > If the benefits of a migration beyond 16-bit, 44.1-kHz audio are so > > obscure, then why do so many people claim that the new formats sound so > > much better, especially when they're auditioning in nonideal listening > > environments? One pragmatic answer is that brains are fickle organs; if > > someone wants to believe that one thing is better than another, the > > brain happily distorts its sensory inputs to create the desired result. > > If you've just spent tens of thousands of dollars to upgrade your gear > > and music collection, that investment can be a strong perception > > incentive. > > http://www.edn.com/article/CA272755.html> > > > http://www.edn.com/article/CA272755.html > http://www.edn.com/article/CA276213.html DeVerm Wrote: > - it might even be explained by evolution of species where it lead to > echo-location with dolphins etc. !! > - that more research papers were released than the discussed one: 1991, > 2001, 2001, 2003, 2005 etc. All by the same set of authors... > - that they are already developing therapeutic methods based on the > hypersonic effect, for treating brain diseases. !!!! Have they tried combining it with crystals? > http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~ashon/audio/Ultrasonics.htm That appears to be a research paper for a freshman seminar is pyschology. -- opaqueice ------------------------------------------------------------------------ opaqueice's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4234 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=54077 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
