Labarum;354647 Wrote: 
> The Transporter gives up above 24/96.
> 
> At over £1000 I will wait to see at what definition domestic music
> settles - it may be higher than 24/96.
> 
> In the meantime I have large CD collection, and for that SB3 and a good
> DAC will do fine.
> 
> The SB3 I have just ordered from Amazon for £121 - the packaging is
> damaged. Do I care? I have a bargain and an interim solution that is
> better than my Quad 77 CDP.
> 
> I will explore the upgrades - but maybe a better power supply (from
> Maplin?) will accomplish as much.

Brian,
I have some high-res downloads that I have resampled to 48/24 - they
sound fantastic via the SB3. I  listened to SACD and DVD-A fairly
extensively when they first appeared - the great new hope! - and... I'm
left with a "so what" feeling about them, but of course YMMV.

Blu-ray DVD vs normal is a no-brainer by comparison.

I'm not convinced that 24/96 or higher will be available across the
back catalogue for maybe 10 years...maybe never (for non-classical
stuff anyway)

The Stontronics linear supply from Farnell I use is great and about £18
from memory. Not sure Maplin do a suitable one.

The SB does sound different to a Quad 77 (I have a  friend with one of
those).  

Cheers
Phil


-- 
Phil Leigh

You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it
ain't what you'd call minimal...SB3+Stontronics PSU - Altmann
JISCO/UPCI - TACT 2.2X (Linear PSU) + Good Vibrations S/W - MF
Triplethreat(Audiocom full mods)- Linn 5103 - Aktiv 5.1 system (6x
LK140's, ESPEK/TRIKAN/KATAN/SEIZMIK 10.5), Townsend Supertweeters,
Kimber & Chord cables
Outdoors: Boombox+Creative Sub (If I remember to turn it on...)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Phil Leigh's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=85
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=54335

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to