Pale Blue Ego;318179 Wrote: 
> I believe Denon just introduced a $500 gold-plated ethernet cable.
> 
> As for The Absolute Sound, I've actually been very impressed with the
> way they've embraced file-based playback as a serious emerging trend. 
> It's just funny to see them approach it from a point of view which is
> heavily skewed by decades of traditional audiophilia.
> 
> The same issue features a re-review of the QSonix Q110 Music Server and
> in particular its partnership with MusicGiants online service.  That
> review is also laughably naive in many spots.  They do mention several
> issues which would be deal-breakers for Squeezebox users, but they tend
> to gloss over these fundamental flaws to embrace an overwhelmingly fun
> experience - "I was like a kid in a candy store!"  The reality:
> 
> The system costs $5,995 for a 250-GB capacity and $9095 for 1.5-TB. 
> It's hard to justify a $3000 price increase for a $300 hardware
> upgrade.  Ooh wait - the $9000 model has a 17" touch screen instead of
> a 15", LOL. 
> 
> There is no support for non-proprietary formats.  The only choices are
> WMA Lossless, WMA 320kbps, and WMA 192kbps.  UGH. 
> 
> A recent hardware upgrade features "far less fan noise" - as if ANY fan
> noise is acceptable in a high-end listening environment.
> 
> 
> I don't have the original review in front of me, but I believe that was
> the one where they panned the QSonix's sound quality as being very
> flawed and strongly suggested investing in a top-quality outboard DAC. 
> So, $6000 - $9000 is just the beginning if you want the thing to
> actually sound good.
> 
> Most of the review is concerned with the MusicGiants service.  The
> reviewer was ga-ga over the idea that he could just point, click, pay,
> and get CD-quality music files.  MusicGiants calls these files "HD",
> because according to the company, CD audio is "high definition"
> compared to mp3.  The reviewer (Robert Harley) takes them to task and
> calls this policy "misleading".  
> 
> A few titles are available in "SuperHD", which is music encoded as
> 20-bit, 88.2kHz WMA files.  No mention is made of the sources, though. 
> I strongly suspect these are standard CD WAV files run through the WMP
> encoder, because the company says they will soon have "thousands of
> titles" available in SuperHD.  Laughably, "the QSonix system "does not
> yet have the ability to handle SuperHD files".
> 
> 
> Pricing:  Tracks are $1.29 each and the minimum purchase is $20. 
> Hmm...so you'd have to buy at least 16 tracks every time you buy.  That
> doesn't seem consumer-friendly at all.  The reviewer didn't mention the
> price of the SuperHD files, so I checked the MusicGiants site.  Looks
> like a lot of the SuperHD files are only available full albums, not as
> individual tracks.  I added an album to my cart, and the price was
> $19.99.  I guess I'd have to add at least one more track or album to my
> cart to meet the $20 minimum, LOL.
> 
> The review also covers the MusicGiants "Concierge Collection" - groups
> of albums and tracks that you buy in a block (no discount over
> individual track prices, though).  These collections typically cost
> $1200 - $1500 and are mailed to you on a small hard drive.  The minimum
> "concierge" purchase is $495.  The reviewer seemed to think this was a
> wonderful way to buy music, and the concept is heavily promoted on the
> MusicGiants site.  Mr. Harley thinks this could be ideal way to build a
> hi-def collection:
> 
> 
> "Audiophiles want hi-res sources, but record companies have shown no   
> interest in a new high-res packaged medium.  With the availability of
> universally compatible files, who needs a new format?"
> 
> Universally compatible?  He's talking about WMA files with DRM.  Mr.
> Harley is just completely clueless here.
> 
> MusicGiants selection is also fairly paltry.  There were only 3 Pink
> Floyd albums available, no Zappa titles at all, and for artists with
> extensive catalogs, there seemed to be offerings only from one record
> company, leaving out huge chunks of careers. 
> 
> 
> Also an issue was a dearth of metadata.  Mr. Harley lamented the fact
> that he couldn't tell when an album was released or who the individual
> players were.  In addition, when metadata was supplied, it was often
> wrong.  For instance, Clapton's "461 Ocean Boulevard" was listed with a
> release date of 1996.  They're obviously pulling their metadata from
> Amazon.  To address this problem, MusicGiants says they are "very
> close" to a deal with the All-Music Guide site to provide better
> metadata.
> 
> 
> Anyway, the QSonix + MusicGiants combo is a pretty expensive candy
> store!  It's also an exclusively Windows candy store.  But, expense is
> not a problem for many audiophiles, and the ability to show off their
> sexy touchscreen interface will trump any concerns about price, sound
> quality, fan noise, DRM, shoddy metadata, limited selection, or OS
> compatibility.
> 
> 
> 

Qsonix is actully a great device in order to catalog and store your
music. Qsonix supports WAV files and FLAC audio too. in addition, they
are HD compatiable. I have 2000+ CDs in my unit at WAV, WMA Lossless,
and a hand full of HD files(from MusicGiants). Qsonix is about the
interface and the User experience, that's what you pay for not
hardware. I see your points, but your opinion seems extremely bias (for
good reasons im sure). Truth be told, the Qsonix S/PDIF out sounds great
without my outboard DAC. I understand that everyone has their own ears
though. Simply put, qsonix has created a flawless interface to
re-explore your music. some of the MusicGiants issues you described i
can agree with. However, the quality is there in my opinion.  If we all
based opinions off of reviews(from a mag that you bashed as well) we
would be mindless robots... As the old saying goes - "don't bash it
till you try it."


-- 
marc0716
------------------------------------------------------------------------
marc0716's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=21765
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=49614

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to