pfarrell;370893 Wrote: > Pete Fowler wrote: > > http://www.jitter.de/english/engc_navfr.html > > Thanks for the link > > > There is no substitute for digging out the information on your own. > > Don't make that someone else's problem - go find it for yourself. > > I don't get why when I ask for solid science to back up the claims, I > get grief. I don't want to find it for myself, when I've looked, I > have > found tons of marketing spin. I expect those claiming that there is an > issue to back it up with links and citations to engineering and > scientific data. > > -- > Pat Farrell > http://www.pfarrell.com/
So...did you read the article at the link? Did you also read the linked articles within the main article? Did you understand it all (or at least most of it)? If you didn't understand something do you have questions? (Notice I did not ask if you agreed with the opinions or conclusions offered - just that you understood the technical aspects of jitter, how to measure it, etc. ya?) If yes to most of the above, you now have a fairly solid technical understanding of jitter and why it matters. Not a complete view, but pretty comprehensive. Enough to begin to judge whether someone is selling snake oil or actually knows their stuff. The article on measuring jitter and evaluating jitter is especially useful for sniffing out BS. If you didn't read the article(s), well...Lord Kelvin did a lot of hard work to get where he was. One should emulate one's heroes rather than simply quote them... Pete -- Pete Fowler ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Pete Fowler's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=20270 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=56425 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
