Themis;376488 Wrote: > > Perhaps I'm mistaken, mind you, but I haven't seen any audio > improvement for the last 30 years which didn't have to go through a > tough criticism about "audible" this and "not the main problem" that. > Am I the only one to find that strange ? I have sympathy for what you're saying, really I do. The problem is, no-one is going to take notice and pay attention until someone goes beyond subjective impressions and actually demonstrates and shows there is an audible difference.
Think how great it would be for Sony if they could have done a scientific study proving (I mean properly proving) that SACD is audibly better than 16/44. It would be a fantastic marketing tool, and perhaps they could have made SACD the new standard with that genius-stroke of PR. But my point is not about whether they COULD have proved it or not, it isn't about what is true. My point is that they didn't prove it and neither has anyone else. So nothing happened and all the people who needed to get behind it didn't get behind it. Darren -- darrenyeats SB3 / Inguz -> Krell KAV-300i (pre bypass) -> PMC AB-1 Dell laptop -> JVC UX-C30 mini system ------------------------------------------------------------------------ darrenyeats's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10799 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=54077 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
