Klaas;400118 Wrote: > I have a question about the test tracks. Would it be better to use sine > sweeps for the testing? For digital room correction the measurement is > done with sine sweeps and the articles/website write something about a > good noise rejection with long sweeps (45 secs enough 1 minute perfect > too much). I am no pro and just believe what should be best, so I > wonder if a sine sweep would provide more accurate results. Listining > would be a pain but maybe for the first test to get -xxDB result :)
Hi! Well that depends on the DRC ... for instance the TACT uses an impulse response as its starting point rather than sine-sweeps. This isn't really about just frequency response (although if there is a change in FR then the software should detect that and you would expect to hear some music in the difference track) - and anyway, music is just a bunch of sine waves :). However I'll try some swept sines and also some square waves to see what happens in case there is anything interesting. -- Phil Leigh You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it ain't what you'd call minimal... SB3 (wired) - TACT 2.2X (Linear PSU) + Good Vibrations S/W - MF Triplethreat(Audiocom full mods) - Linn 5103 - Aktiv 5.1 system (6x LK140's, ESPEK/TRIKAN/KATAN/SEIZMIK 10.5), Townsend Supertweeters, Blue Jeans Digital,Kimber Speaker & Chord Interconnect cables Outdoors: Boom ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Phil Leigh's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=85 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=60041 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
