El Duderino;410682 Wrote: > The problem here is that many individuals seem to think that you can > take the scientific concept of a double-blind randomized controlled > trial and apply it to areas which one could argue are distinctly > non-scientific. This is a fallacy. > What is a fallacy is thinking that sighted comparisons...of just about anything involving the five senses...aren't influenced by expectation bias. That is acknowledged generally to be a very unrealistic viewpoint. This unusual belief is popular only in the audiophile world as far as I know. Darren
-- darrenyeats http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/richpub/listmania/byauthor/A3H57URKQB8AQO/ref=cm_pdp_content_listmania/203-7606506-5721503. (Inguz bass EQ'd) SB3 -> (pre bypassed) Krell KAV-300i -> PMC AB-1 (caps bass EQ'd) Laptop -> Genius Slab SW-flat2.1 700 SB3 / Rio Karma / Laptop -> JVC UX-C30 / Sennheiser PX-100 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ darrenyeats's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10799 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=38815 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
