On 03/01/10 04:03, rgheck wrote: > > Robin Bowes;501888 Wrote: >> Aha! Proof that you really don't know what you're talking about. >> >> I suggest you go and read up on what jitter actually is, and then use >> your new-found knowledge to understand why the above-quoted paragraph >> is >> just plain wrong. > > I have, very recently, read a good deal on the subject, and apparently > know a lot more about it than you do. (Get a clue, dude: Sony cares a > LOT about this sort of thing.)
Then I suggest you hone your reading skills. As Phil Leigh has also pointed out, "jitter" is not burned to disk. The fact that you suggest the contrary is clear evidence that you don't really understand what jitter is. > But since you are obviously nothing but a > troll who is too much of a coward even to register for the site, I don't > care to discuss this with you any further. Dude, I am user #480 [1], joined on 5/5/2005. How 'bout you? However, I read/post to the forum via the mailing list which is why I show up as "guest". R. [1] http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?u=480 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
