Patrick Dixon;502034 Wrote: 
> Maybe that's true for 'random' jitter, but in the real world jitter is
> seldom random and it's spectral content is likely to have an effect on
> its audibility, just as much as its absolute amplitude.
> 
> Jitter is just another form of distortion, and as with distortion, the
> character of the jitter is an important element in its audible effect.

The main problem with most studies I've seen of this is that they use a
pure test tone (17kHz, in one widely quoted study, for example), and see
if people can detect the presence of jitter in that signal. And then,
when people can't, they conclude that jitter is inaudible. This is very
strange methodology. Similar tests long ago showed that nothing matters
except THD.


-- 
rgheck

Transporter --> Pass Labs D1 --> Pass Labs Aleph 2s --> Thiel CS 1.6s
Transporter --> Adcom GDA-600 --> Pass Labs B1 (DIY) --> Adcom GFA-5800
--> Thiel CS 1.6s
Receiver --> T-Amp --> Monitor Audio Radius 90s
Receiver --> Sony HT Receiver (Garbage) --> Monitor Audio Raduis HT
Setup
SqueezeboxServer on a 350MHz Pentium II with 768MB RAM, 1.5TB storage,
running Centos 5.x
------------------------------------------------------------------------
rgheck's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=25803
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=71321

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to