adamdea;635406 Wrote: > There are people out there who say that the improvement from 96 to 192 > > exceeds that from 44 to 96: It's the final step where veils are lifted, > music takes on an analogue-like ease and flow etc. > I am not really sure that there is any need to go over 44 kHz (take a > look over on hydrogen audio if you dare). I'm not even sure that there > exists any program material which has information recorded in the > frequency range 96-192. There seem to be frequent exposees of the > shortage of over 44kHz program material > Why stop at 192kHz- why not 384 (which some DACs can handle).
There are people out there who think that Elvis is alive. They aren't correct... NONE of those claimants will take a blind test because they would simply fail. -- Phil Leigh You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it ain't what you'd call minimal... Touch(wired/XP) - Audiolense 3.3/2.0+INGUZ DRC - MF M1 DAC - Linn 5103 - full Aktiv 5.1 system (6x LK140's, ESPEK/TRIKAN/KATAN/SEIZMIK 10.5), Pekin Tuner, Townsend Supertweeters, Blue Jeans Belden Digital,Kimber 8TC Speaker & Chord Signature Plus Interconnect cables Stax4070+SRM7/II phones Kitchen Boom, Outdoors: SB Radio, Harmony One remote for everything. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Phil Leigh's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=85 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=88056 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
