adamdea;635419 Wrote: > Even the last part is questionable provided 16 bit material is properly > dithered and noise-shaped. > > I am beginning to doubt whether I could identify 24/96 from 16/44 > blind. At normal listening levels, where the only difference between the 24/96 and 16/44 is the sample rate & word depth (ie. a 24/96 source has been *properly* converted to 16/44 without any other jiggery-pokery), I doubt there is a single person on the planet who could pass such a test.
-- cliveb Transporter -> ATC SCM100A ------------------------------------------------------------------------ cliveb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=348 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=88056 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
