garym;693397 Wrote: > Which is why hydrogenaudio.org has (and seriously enforces) its TOS#8 to > keep the crazies away.... > > 8. All members that put forth a statement concerning subjective sound > quality, must -- to the best of their ability -- provide objective > support for their claims. Acceptable means of support are double blind > listening tests (ABX or ABC/HR) demonstrating that the member can > discern a difference perceptually, together with a test sample to allow > others to reproduce their findings. Graphs, non-blind listening tests, > waveform difference comparisons, and so on, are not acceptable means of > providing support.
Yes... except to say that I'm personally OK with people suggesting something MIGHT sound different so that we can choose (or not) to try it for ourselves. What I'm not OK with is any suggestion that if someone can't hear something(because it isn't actually there to be heard) then they are stupid/deaf/have a rubbish system/have a closed mind/lack experience/lack "conceptual knowledge" (sic) I think the Hydrogen Audio line is little "hard core"... -- Phil Leigh You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it ain't what you'd call minimal... Touch(wired/W7)+Teddy Pardo PSU - Audiolense 3.3/2.0+INGUZ DRC - MF M1 DAC - Linn 5103 - full Aktiv 5.1 system (6x LK140's, ESPEK/TRIKAN/KATAN/SEIZMIK 10.5), Pekin Tuner, Townsend Supertweeters,VdH Toslink,Kimber 8TC Speaker & Chord Signature Plus Interconnect cables Stax4070+SRM7/II phones Kitchen Boom, Outdoors: SB Radio, Harmony One remote for everything. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Phil Leigh's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=85 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=93549 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
