Mnyb wrote: 
> Archimago , I do have a theory about why the upsampling behaves so weird
> on your DAC , it's intentional otherwise no one would hear any
> difference when pressing that button :) and users would complain .

I thought about that possibility as well when testing the ASUS Essence
One. Certainly it could be intentional that they selected a filter that
low-passed at 15kHz to remove the high-end "harshness" to perhaps sound
a little NOS-like...  Obviously IMO, they went WAAAAY overboard! I also
checked the impulse response and it's clear they're still using a linear
phase filter.

When I raised this issue on the head-fi forum, this was what I got from
'ASUSXONAR' (I guess one of their reps there):
"We have been looking into this. During development we were given a
choice of four different filter options (not all at the same time
obviously). The current filter was chosen and it favors high sampling
rates (88KHz upwards), the side effect being the sharp cut-off for lower
sampling rates.

We're working with the developer and discussing a new filter that is
less aggressive at lower sampling rates. There are side effects to every
choice, but we'll try and do something that is more universal."

Hmmm... I always thought upsampling was for the purpose of improving
quality of the lower sampling rates - why would anyone want to "favour"
88kHz and above!?

Well, I hope they make it right with a new firmware upgrade.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archimago's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2207
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=97950

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to