Archimago wrote: 
> I would still argue (ultra-kamikaze-like) that if one could tell a
> difference between FLAC vs. WAV vs. AIFF vs. APE vs. WV vs. ALAC, then
> there's *something wrong with their hardware*!  To actually hear a
> difference (not just bias of some sort) should not be like some badge of
> honor to the audiophile IMO. It's actually a bad thing suggesting
> corruption of the sound due to some form of processing/decoding and the
> piece of hardware should be examined for fault - not capable of
> distortion-free bit-perfection!

well, SC is converting ALAC to FLAC using faad/sox, so i guess the
difference I'm hearing is actually between FLAC and AIFF, both of which
are converted natively by the TP.

and would it surprise you to learn i hear a difference between wired and
wireless to the TP, and prefer the former?  what ever bias might be
involved, i assure you it's an inconvenient one- running ethernet to my
system was a pain in the ass.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
netchord's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=21002
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=98630

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to