jkeny wrote: > You mean how using a local clean clock in the USB receiving device to > time the USB signl is better than timing it with a derived clock running > in a computer powered by electrical noisy PS & sharing a an environment > bathed in emi & RFI? Why a stable clock would be better at timing than a > clock which is subjected to current fluctuations occuring from the > computer's moment-to-moment activity.
Based on your prior posts and without knowing anything about internal and external clocks I would guess that the above statement is just another audiophile misrepresentation of what is actually going on. So first how about you prove, even with anecdotal evidence, that "a computer powered by electrical noisy PS & sharing a an environment bathed in emi & RFI" has any effect on the clock timing? Living Rm: Transporter-SimAudio pre/power amps-Vandersteen 3A Sign. & sub Home Theater: Touch-Marantz HTR-Energy Veritas 2.1 & Linn sub Computer Rm: Touch-Headroom Desktop w/DAC-Aragon amp-Energy Veritas 2.1 & Energy sub Bedroom: Touch-HR Desktop w/DAC-Audio Refinement amp-Energy Veritas 2.0 Guest Rm: Duet-Sony soundbar Garage: SB3-JVC compact system Controls: iPeng; SB Controller; Moose & Muso Server: SBS on dedicated windows 7 computer w/2 Drobos 'Last.fm' (http://www.last.fm/user/jazzfann/) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ralphpnj's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10827 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=103684 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles
