edwardthern wrote: 
> Or sample variations in the USB cables?
> Or sample variations in the wallwart power supplies?
> Or sample variations in the analog cables leading from the Dacs to the
> Preamp?
> 
> All of the above were identical too.
> 
> Or even variations in the solder joints inside the preamp for input 1 vs
> input 2.
By all means add these possibilities to the list.

edwardthern wrote: 
> I'd not consider any of the above as attributing to the difference in
> sound simply because parts tolerance usually covers any perceptible or
> measurable difference in end products.
So you're going to dismiss the possibility of hardware variation, but
you're happy to believe that two software players that deliver the same
data stream to said hardware must be the source of the perceived
difference? <bonkers>

Of course, the component which has the greatest variability between
auditioning one or other component is the state of the listener. But I'm
sure you'll dismiss that, too.

The thing that bothers me most is that I have taken the bait. You are an
excellent fisherman, sir.



Transporter -> ATC SCM100A
------------------------------------------------------------------------
cliveb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=348
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=106537

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to